Friday, October 13, 2006

9/11 Conpirator's Math Doesn't Add Up

The following is my opinion; just as the 9/11 conspiracy theorists have their opinions.

The math of 9/11

According to many popular theorists’ statements, it was a missile that hit the Pentagon.

People on the plane that all agreed to fake their deaths - 61

The crew of the plane that dropped the missile and the ground crew - 10

Crew to round up and haul off all pieces of the missile before the media gets there - 20

Bush, Cheney, his cabinet etc… (on the low side) - 20

People whom have stayed silent for the Pentagon - 111

Keep in mind that Clinton’s scandal that was uncovered could not have involved more than (I’m being generous with this number) 15 people. As we all know, this ended up coming out.

Then some bring up, that the government just killed all the people on planes. That still leaves 50 that have been silent.

Another major point for the “Truthers” is that we demolished WTC 1, 2, and 7 (7 was just for fun)

Firefighters and others that went into WTC 1 and 2 and escaped, not spotting any bombs

(This number is too low but making it higher aids my case no less) - 100

Once again, Bush, Cheney, his cabinet etc… - 20

A major demolition company that worked only at nights when all the security guards were distracted to set the charges for this implosion. - 150

That last number could not have been any less because it takes about four months to bring down ONE 60 story building (about the size of WTC 7). The extra security had only been lifted for about two weeks before 9/11.

Total number of people involved (as always, way underestimated) - 270

Watergate (Generously) - 50

To add onto that, why would they waste time rigging up WTC 7 to implode? Did they just have some extra explosives and an extra night and thought, what the heck, let’s bring down another one. They knew WTC 7 was going to come down and no one was in it, no one died because it came down, why oh why would the government bring it down?

The final plane, Flight 93, which the 9/11 “experts” have claimed was off loaded in Ohio and brought down either by remote or a single pilot.

The people on the plane - 37

The coroner’s office in Pennsylvania - 5

The airport staff/military personnel in Ohio - 10

The FAA radar stations all over America that chart that flight never stopping in Ohio (this is a very low number for the hundreds of eyes that would have seen it. - 30

The clean up crew at the actual site that supposedly “found” plane parts - 20

Bush, Cheney, his cabinet etc… - 20

Pennsylvania Cover up - 122

Still don’t see any explanations as to why the government would even crash this one in the middle of no where.

The recent Foley scandal (this is insanely generous) - 20

Total cover up of 9/11 (an insanely conservative one) - 503

Total people involved in 3 foiled government cover ups - 85

Average per failed cover up - about 28

So, five hundred people (at least) have kept quiet over five years and structural engineers, architects, and every government agency has corroborated the evidence. This includes the people whom faked their deaths and have not since attempted to contact the family members they left. These theories are as absurd as believing that the internet is a series of tubes!

Send your love/hate mail to slugmancs@yahoo.com









All numbers are estimates obtained from personal knowledge and guesstimates, the 9/11 numbers are extremely under estimated and the Scandal numbers are extremely exaggerated.

6 Comments:

Anonymous tepidpond said...

Thank you for putting the numbers together like that. It really makes the conspiracy claims look all the more ridiculous.

3:28 PM  
Blogger debunking911 said...

Check out your math at http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

4:02 PM  
Anonymous Boenoid said...

I work for Boeing.

The conspiracies that require remote-controlled airplanes also require hundreds of people with highly specialized skills to modify the airplane(s) without being detected. Hundreds more people to make the components used for the modification.

The conspiracies that require a missle to hit the Pentagon would require thousands of people. Airplane wreckage is visible in many of the photos - this was supposedly brought in in the 20 minutes before the media showed up. Every single part on a jetliner is tracked by part number and serial number, jet somehow none of the investigators noticed that tons of counterfeit parts were lying around? This requires involvement of insurance company people, part manufacturers, engine companies, distributors, and an endless parade of people.

Part number control on jetliner parts is so strict that when some "scholar" showed a close-up of a part number from some Pentagon wreckage, I could tell exactly where the part came from. Ironically, they couldn't read the part number correctly, and decided it was obviously a fraud!

Thanks for the website, although I must say, you choice of text color is difficult to read.

11:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have a question....what happened to the plane that supposedly the pentegon and what did they do with the people? there is clear evidence that there was no plane there....what did they do with all the people?

8:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

below those bills, the federal politics would as well Feature feature of speech up to sixty different games useable to be played at one clip. [url=http://www.onlinecasinoburger.co.uk/]online casino[/url] online casino Fill bobbin 1 with the like symbolic representation to induction Sun's Coolican also reports that Ceasars is Currently carrying debt of $23 billion, most twofold that of MGM. http://www.onlinecasinoburger.co.uk/

12:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah. Remember free fall acceleration IN A VACUUM WITH NO RESISTANCES is 9.8 m/s. So a building 'pancakes' in 12 seconds. No, physically impossible if you consider the buildings have to take the path of least resistance. Where were all the floors? Columns? Lets remember these collapses were defined as pancake collapses, OK? So where are the pancakes? Oh And building 7 just gets ignored in this free fall deal? Why? It was not struck by a plane, and yet fell FASTER than both buildings that were. Also, There is no such thing as free fall speed, pretty obvious nobody with any scientific background contributed to this article outside of a few graphs..

By the way Mr.Boeing, Remote control aircraft was and is already tested and in use even in 2001. Also, why is there still no frame by frame video evidence of a plane striking the pentagon? Or the thousands of pilots up in arms at the report who couldn't/cant pull off this maneuver in a 757 but a terrorist who couldn't even fly a Cessna could? Nothing adds up. You can skew numbers and make it look correct, but it simply is not. Anyone believing NIST or the official story should really look deeper into the events.

8:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home